June 27, 2003
by Matthew Davies
Issues of human sexuality have had a profound
impact on the Anglican Communion in recent weeks, giving a cause
for celebration for some and anxiety in others. Firstly, there was
the appointment of Canon Jeffrey John as the Bishop of Reading,
then the Diocese of New Westminster in Canada issued a formal rite
for the blessings of same sex unions and, to add insult to injury
for many conservatives and fundamentalists, the Diocese of New Hampshire
elected the Revd Canon Gene Robinson as its bishop.
Canon Robinson is the first openly gay man to
be elected bishop in the Anglican Communion. Some bishops, however,
have admitted their homosexuality later in their episcopacy. Reactions
to his ordination have been both strong and varied, although the
landslide victory suggests that many clergy and laity in his diocese
have every faith in his ministry.
In a statement issued by the bishops of the Diocese
of South Carolina, they said, "This election causes us the gravest
possible concern, for if the church ratifies it, we would clearly
be approving of the relationship in which Gene Robinson is involved.
This is not about a person or a diocesan election process; it is
about a radical change in church doctrine."
Canon Robinson, aged 56, took the difficult decision
to leave his wife because he felt that God wanted him to acknowledge
his sexuality. When asked, "What risks have you taken for the Gospel?"
he replied, "Risking the loss of my children and the exercise of
my ordained ministry in the Church was the biggest risk I've ever
taken, but it left me with two unshakable things: my integrity and
my God.
When clergy in six parishes within the Diocese
of New Westminster had been authorised by Bishop Michael Ingham
to perform a rite of blessing same sex unions, with the first blessing
being conducted on Wednesday 28 May, there was an outcry throughout
the Anglican Communion which has resulted in two provinces - Nigeria
and South East Asia - cutting their ties with the diocese.
Archbishop Peter Akinola of Nigeria has said,
"Regrettably, the much desired reflection that will ease the strain
on our Communion has been jettisoned. Furthermore, failure to ensure
strict compliance with resolutions duly passed at our meetings clearly
shows that Bishop [Michael] Ingham and his diocese see no value
in being accountable to anybody." He ended his statement by saying
that [Bishop Michael Ingham] has made it inevitable for the Province
[of Nigeria] to severe communion with Bishop Ingham and the diocese
of New Westminster."
Taking a more via media stance, the Most Reverend
Terence Finlay, Archbishop of Toronto, said last year, "I respect
the right of individual dioceses to make a decision in this matter
even though it would have been preferable for us to act together
as a church."
He added, "I am deeply aware of how difficult
this complex issue is for some people. Many faithful gay and lesbian
Christians are living in committed and long-term relationships and
believe that the Church has been too slow to recognise the presence
of God's Spirit in these relationships. Other equally faithful Christians
hold to a more traditional understanding of this issue and oppose
any change."
In his own defence, Bishop Michael Ingham said
in his letter to the six dioceses on 23 May 2003, "The church recognises
that homosexual couples face the same challenges and share the same
responsibilities as other people in living out the costly demands
of love. Our purpose is to encourage and strengthen fidelity and
mutual supportiveness in family life on which the stability of our
wider society depends."
In a statement issued today Bishop Ingham has
said that Anglicans in the Diocese of New Westminster will continue
to support fellow Anglicans in northern Canada and overseas, despite
the declaration by some bishops in these areas that relations are
impaired.
Bishop Ingham also released a pastoral letter
today, with the intention that it is read in all 80 of his dioceses
parishes on Sunday 29 June. Part of that letter read, We shall not
exclude or reject our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ, whatever
their personal convictions, and we wish to assure them that the
doors of our churches remain open to all. The full text of the pastoral
letter is available at: http://www.anglicancommunion.org/acns/special/humansexuality/hs4.html.
The election of Canon Jeffrey John as Bishop
of Reading took place on the 20 May but more attention has been
drawn to the appointment since the news from the Dioceses of New
Westminster and New Hampshire emerged.
Canon Jeffrey, who is treasurer and canon theologian
at Southwark Cathedral, was appointed to the suffragan post last
month by the Bishop of Oxford, the Rt Revd Richard Harries. Despite
the fact that there have been many requests for him to withdraw
from the position, Bishop Harries has strongly supported his case
for the appointment. He pointed out that Canon Jeffrey has made
it clear that he is fully committed to upholding the doctrine and
practice of the Church of England as expressed in the House of Bishops'
report, Issues in Human Sexuality. He also stressed that "Jeffrey
is personally committed, as his references made clear, to a personal
lifestyle of sexual abstinence."
Later in his statement he said, "I want a diocese
that is able to show everyone, including gay and lesbian people,
that they are beloved of God."
In an interview with the BBC this week, Bishop
Harries further defended the election of Canon Jeffrey. What I was
looking for was a person in the catholic tradition with a good knowledge
of church growth, he said. That is where we need the impetus at
the moment.
Speaking of Canon Jeffrey as being a symbol for
many in the acceptance and affirmation of gay and lesbian people
in the church, Bishop Harries said, We will have a much more honest
debate about the subject. My hope is that in two years he will have
won the hope and trust both of the House of Bishops and people in
his episcopal area.
A group of 35 Anglican leaders from around the
world met in Oxford on Wednesday calling on Dr John to withdraw
his acceptance. Part of the statement, which had the backing of
two Primates, Archbishop Drexel Gomez of West Indies and Archbishop
Gregory Venables of the Southern Cone, said, "We urge Dr Jeffrey
John to withdraw his acceptance. This appointment flouts the mainstream
Anglican teaching on human sexuality. We believe that if he is consecrated,
the unity of the Church of England and Anglican Communion will be
disrupted.
Eight bishops of the Church of England, however,
wrote to the Archbishop of Canterbury in support of Dr John, but
urged that the debate should be carried on privately.
Despite the many dynamic comments and statements
that have materialised on both sides of the argument, some of the
more recent pronouncements have expounded the opinion that the issues
are to be dealt with at a provincial level. The Most Revd Clive
Handford, President Bishop of Jerusalem and the Middle East, said,
I was a little surprised at the appointment because of the potential
risk of controversy. However, while not knowing Dr John personally,
I believe him to be an excellent and highly regarded priest. It
is significant that he has stated that he is celibate and has been
for some years. I shall take no action other than to keep Dr John
and those involved in my prayers. He added that no one in this Province
has requested that any action be taken.
A statement from the Archbishop of Southern Africa,
the Most Revd Njongonkulu Ndungane, also supported this perspective.
The issue surrounding the appointment of Jeffrey John as a suffragan
bishop affects, in the first instance, the diocese of Oxford and
the Church in England, not the Church of the Province of Southern
Africa, he said.
A statement issued today from the Primate of
Australia, the Most Revd Peter Carnley, called on the need for honesty
and humility, and a willingness to acknowledge the possibility of
alternative readings of hotly disputed texts. The full statement
is available at:
http://www.anglicancommunion.org/acns/articles/34/75/acns3490.html.
In his letter last week to all diocesan and suffragan
bishops in the Church of England, the Archbishop of Canterbury voiced
his own concerns on the matter:
Confidence in the ability of a new bishop to
minister to those in his pastoral care is a centrally important
matter, and it is clear that serious questions remain in the diocese.
To consider these with prayerfulness and maturity needs time and
a measure of calm. It is not for anyone outside the diocese to override
or pre-empt what is obviously a painful and complex process, and
I can only ask your prayers for the diocese as it struggles with
this and tries to find a right discernment.
He concluded by saying, In a few weeks, I shall
be making a pastoral visit to West Africa. Some of our local issues
are there too, of course, but so are most of the greatest wounds
of our age, afflicting millions - violent conflict, epidemic disease,
instability and poverty. Faithful Christian witness shines through
all this, and we are deeply thankful for it. It does us no harm
to think about our own priorities against such a background, and
perhaps to learn in some matters to give each other a little more
time and space for thought as we try to find how we can walk in
step as the Body of Christ - not falling over ourselves because
of anxiety and suspicion.
Anglican Communion News Service
|