May 14, 2003
WASHINGTON - A working group of the World Council
of Churches plans to carry several recommendations on bioethics
to the organization's Central Committee in Geneva this summer.
The working group would like to see the WCC encourage
attention to "upstream questions," said Martin Robra, the council
executive who works with the bioethics issue. Robra spoke at the
end of the working group's May 10-13 meeting, hosted by the United
Methodist Board of Church and Society. The United Methodist Church
is a member and major supporter of the council.
Upstream questions are not concerned with what
to do about cloning or embryonic stem cell research, Robra explained.
Those are "midstream questions," and they tend to dominate most
of churches' discussions on genetics, he said. Rather, the working
group seeks a discussion of "What has brought us here and what did
we learn?" he said.
"What is the specific contribution that has to
come from churches?" he asked.
The working group hopes the WCC and its member
churches will focus on mapping the debate rather than doing the
scientific exploration of the topics, he said. The Central Committee
will meet Aug. 25-Sept. 2.
"What is the problem and who defines it?" he
asked. Technological and sociological viewpoints vie for dominance
in thinking about genetics, he observed. The technological approach
tends to isolate a problem and go for a simple cure, but it ignores
the context of the problem. Rarely does an effect have a single
cause, he added.
Alternatives require seeing an issue in context,
he declared.
Lopeti Senituli, a member of the working group
and director of the Human Rights and Democracy Movement in Tonga,
told of that South Pacific island nation's experience a few years
ago.
In 2000, an Australian firm named Autogen announced
that it had signed an agreement with the Tongan minister of health
to do a study of Tongans' DNA. The focus was on type II diabetes,
also known as adult-onset diabetes. At the time, 14 percent of the
adult population had this form of diabetes.
"Basically all negotiation was done in secret,"
Senituli said. The company claimed it would build a research facility,
provide research grants and share any product developed with the
Tongan people free of charge.
The Tongan Council of Churches was the first
group to ask why the issue had not been discussed in the parliament,
he said. The council also received assistance from the WCC in finding
a way to inform religious leaders of other Pacific nations about
what was happening. The WCC funded a workshop in 2001 and brought
together experts from Germany and the United States, theologians
from the Pacific region and Tongan legal experts.
"As a result of that workshop, the Tongan National
Council of Churches was ready to confront the Tongan government
and Autogen on not only theological grounds but also in terms of
scientific knowledge as to why the Autogen research proposal should
not be accepted," Senituli recalled.
The council of churches believed that research
should not include changes that would be impossible to monitor closely,
he said. Since the research aimed to identify and alter the gene
related to diabetes, any genetic modifications would affect future
generations, he said.
People also felt revulsion for the idea that
someone could own part of someone else's body, he added. "The human
person is God's creation," and the Tongans could not accept a "commodification"
of people or their parts, he said.
"We're very concerned about the 14 percent of
the Tongan population who suffer from diabetes," he said. The council
was challenged for objecting to research that could lead to a cure,
but the group responded that the "cure" was questionable and not
certain.
"Type II diabetes is a lifestyle disease," Senituli
asserted. The cure is preventive care involving changing dietary
habits and increasing exercise, he said. He credited the ministry
of health with doing a good job of education about this.
Autogen withdrew in light of the opposition it
encountered.
In the case of Tonga, Robra noted, an Australian
company was acting for the French subsidiary of Merck, a German
pharmaceutical company. Such complex relationships, coupled with
the opportunities to sell properties or go out of business, make
legal and financial liability extremely difficult to pursue.
"Churches are confronted with a variety of justice
issues," he remarked.
Some of the examples he cited include prenatal
diagnostics that could be used for "negative selection" or aborting
certain types of babies; discrimination resulting from people with
disabilities being seen as defective or inferior beings; commodification
of children; and exploitation of individuals and groups through
patenting.
"It's a question of the trajectory of our culture,"
Robra said. Is it a community of caring or an individual fix - "health
as nurture versus health as product (a technological fix)?" Perhaps
society overemphasizes the technological fix and forgets "health
as nurture" in the context of a caring community, he theorized.
The working group's recommendations for WCC member
churches include establishing an ecumenical network by which the
churches could share information on such issues as bio-piracy. Bio-piracy
refers to an organization, such as a company, seeking an agreement
with a group or individuals to use their cells, DNA or blood to
develop a medicine or therapy that becomes a patent-protected product
of that corporation, Robra said. The "donors" may get a little care
or compensation, but the profit and ownership rests with a far removed
corporate entity, he said.
"Our task is to somehow create an ecumenical
platform to exchange information and respond," Robra said. Other
recommendations developed by the group include continuing the working
group, holding a bioethics seminar in 2004 and a larger conference
the same year, and releasing a study document in 2005.
United Methodist News Service
|