April 16, 2003
by Jan Nunley
A report prepared for the Church of the Province
of South Africa (CPSA), released this month, cites examples of same-sex
unions in traditional indigenous African societies and the South
African constitution's sexual orientation non-discrimination clause
in arguing for a new approach by the church to the blessing of same-sex
relationships.
The Archbishop's Committee on Same-Sex Unions,
chaired by Professor Joan Church of the Diocese of Pretoria and
consisting of senior lay and clerical members of the church, produced
the report in response to a Provincial Synod resolution requiring
the CPSA to clarify its position with regard to same sex unions.
The committee directed its findings to the South African Anglican
Theological Commission.
"The issue of same sex unions strikes at the
heart of the Anglican church, which has fought long and hard for
justice and inclusivity, but a definitive stand is likely to lead
to polarization rather than unity unless all debaters are treated
with respect and dignity," said Archbishop Njongonkulu Ndungane,
in summarizing the report for a press release.
"Besides commissioning the committee, I have
also widely distributed a discussion document within the Anglican
Church and I am calling on Southern Africa's 10 million baptized
Anglicans at all levels to urgently address homosexuality and to
do so in a manner that will generate mutual understanding and bring
people out of their 'corners of conviction,'" Ndungane said. He
cited a statement in the report that the unity of the church must
be upheld but must not be used as "a delaying tactic or as an excuse
to avoid the issue."
Centrality of love
The report briefly outlines an approach to developing
a theology of marriage that takes into account varying understandings
of sexuality (as genitality or as "all-pervasive energy force")
and spirituality (as religiosity or as "touching all of life").
The centrality of love in Jesus' portrait of God as the "Divine
Lover," resulting in the effect that "sexuality seems to have something
of the numinous about it," and the shift in the focus of marriage
from procreation to manifesting the love of God, are recommended
as topics for "reexamination" by an ongoing CPSA dialogue.
A model of biblical interpretation that moves
beyond the "largely fundamentalist" mode of "absolutist, ahistorical"
prooftexting is needed, the report said, to engage the issue of
sexuality seriously. "The model adopted affects the meaning extracted,"
the committee said, recommending a "conversational model" which
"accepts that the Bible is God's Word, but argues that it operates
dynamically, in interaction with everyday life." Such a conversational
model would be "Christocentric, dialogical, canonical, and narrative."
Imported - or indigenous?
Many African Anglican leaders view homosexuality
as a Western cultural import. "The Anglican Church in Africa is
deeply shocked by the very idea of blessing the gay relationship
and having a liturgy for such a service in Church," retired Kenyan
archbishop David Gitari told Anglican Media Sydney shortly after
a decision by the Canadian diocese of New Westminster in 2002 to
permit parishes to bless same-sex relationships. "We are shocked
because when missionaries from the West came to the darkest continent
we were told that homosexuality was a sin. Now people from the West
are telling us it is not a sin despite Paul's words in Romans 1:24-27."
The Archbishop of Nigeria, Peter Akinola, called the Canadian decision
"an act of new imperialism" by churches in the global North.
But according to the South African report, same-sex
relationships are not unknown in traditional African culture, although
in different forms than is common in the United States and other
Western countries. Traditional woman-to-woman marriages "occur all
over Africa," the report stated. In South Africa such marriages
have been recorded among the Venda, Lovedu, Pedi, Zulu and Narene
peoples, among others. The report cites "two main motivations" for
such unions: because of the powerful position of one of the women,
as in the traditional tribal institution of the Rain Queen, or because
one of the women is childless. In the latter case, a male relative
of the "female husband" may be enlisted to impregnate the "bride,"
though he is considered to have no legal or biological rights to
the child.
"While these marriages are infrequent they are
considered far from abnormal," the report stated. Such unions may
be protected under South Africa's Recognition of Customary Marriages
Act, which came into effect in 2000, as well as under Act 108 of
the 1996 South African constitution, which prohibits discrimination
on the basis of sexual orientation. That presents a pastoral dilemma
for churches, said the committee.
Another dilemma is presented by a 1998 Lambeth
Conference resolution on human sexuality rejecting homosexual practice
as incompatible with Scripture and declaring that the bishops of
the Anglican Communion "cannot advise the legitimizing or blessing
of same sex unions nor ordaining those involved in same gender unions."
A separate discussion document on human sexuality, sent by Ndungane
in January to the bishops, clergy and lay leadership of the CPSA,
acknowledged that "the Lambeth Conference is a significant and solemn
part of this process. At the same time however it is also not possible
to assert that the matter was closed for all time in 1998 by the
views of the majority of Bishops at Lambeth at that time. In the
past the Lambeth Conference has 'moved' on a decision taken at a
previous gathering, for example on the use of contraception."
'A theological nightmare'?
Reviewing the legal history and cultural differences
regarding same-sex unions in South Africa and in other countries,
the report noted that although same-sex marriage has not yet been
legally recognized, "it is clear that in less than a decade there
have been major policy changes in South Africa regarding homosexuals
and homosexual conduct...recognizing certain marriage-like rights
of partners in same-sex unions."
Nevertheless, "We are in danger of creating a
theological nightmare," wrote one of the committee's gay members,
in a separate section entitled "A Gay Perspective." Arguing that
opposing a service of "blessing" to a service of marriage creates
confusion, he asked, "What exactly is the difference between seeking
a public recognition by the church of a permanent relationship through
marriage and seeking the blessing of a permanent relationship?"
The committee recommended that the CPSA "set
in motion a pastoral process to help the church engage, at all levels,
with homosexuality," including consultation with non-governmental
organizations (NGOs), ecumenical partners and other stakeholders
in the issue in what is called an "indaba," a Zulu concept meaning
a council or meeting to discuss an important matter. The committee
recommends that the process should result in a report for the next
Provincial Synod.
Members of the committee included Professor Church;
Judge Thollie Madala; the Very Rev. Peter Lenkoe; Canon Godfrey
Henwood; the Revs. Michelle Pilet, Tim Long, Douglas Torr and Lynda
Wyngaard; and Sr. Maureen (OHP).
Episcopal News Service
The Rev. Jan Nunley is deputy director of Episcopal News Service.
|