April 4, 2003
by James Solheim
"We are living in the midst of a historic transformation
in Jewish-Christian relations," said Rabbi Eugene Korn, director
of interfaith affairs at the Anti-Defamation League, in his introduction
to an April 3 panel discussion on "Jewish-Christian Relations in
the New Millenium: From Contention to Cooperation" at the 92nd Street
Y in New York City. The panel, linked by satellite with six other
sites, was part of a series presented by the Bronfman Center for
Jewish Life.
"We have progressed quite a bit" since the theological
debate between the two religions was described in the 13th century
as a "religious duel to the death," Korn said. Today there is growing
recognition that both Christians and Jews are "sincere believers,
faithful to their traditions. And now we realize the power of religion
for good and bad," especially in the wake of the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001.
Introducing the panelists - Cardinal Avery Dulles,
Presiding Bishop Frank T. Griswold of the Episcopal Church and Rabbi
Norman Lamm, president of Yeshiva University - Korn said that the
panel would explore "how to honestly confront our past, what we
have in common, what divides us and how to make the future better
and more hopefulmoving beyond a painful and tortured past."
Virus of anti-Semitism
In response to a question on what has influenced
relations between Judaism and Christianity, Griswold said, "The
Holocaust has obliged Christians to look very seriously at their
own, possibly unacknowledged, anti-Semitism, present in a quiet
but real way in some of our liturgical texts and in the ways we
have deported ourselves in relation to the Jewish experience as
in some way superceding the Jewish experience."
Griswold said that "the Holocaust created in
Christians a self-scrutiny that has lead to repentance in the ways
we have been complicit in patterns of anti-Semitism. The establishment
of the State of Israel has given Jews a sense of place and sense
of identity and out of that renewed sense of confidence a level
of conversation is possible because, in many places, the Jewish
community no longer feels threatened by the Christian communityso
our conversation can be deeper and truer and more explicit."
Lamm said that the "pope gets a great deal of
credit - for Vatican II's bringing the Catholic world to a recognition
of Judaism as legitimate in its own way, his recognition of Israel,
his visit to the Wailing Wall and a Roman synagogue. These are all
gestures heavy with symbolism." Yet he quickly added that he fears
that despite all the improvement of relations "what's happening
now in Europe and the Christian West - the virulent anti-Zionism,
anti-Israel attitudes, which to a large measure is a cover-up for
anti-Semitism - is like a virus that has been dormant a long time."
Korn also expressed gratitude that the pope "has
spoken of Israel not only as a political entity but recognizes the
spiritual meaning of the Jews returning to the homeland for the
Christian community." In light of enormous controversy and debate
over extremely complex Israeli-Palestinian relations, he believes
that "sometimes legitimate criticism of Israel crosses the line
into anti-Semitism, particularly apparent in Europe. What can we
do to increase understanding and reduce the disease or the cancer?"
Offspring of Abraham
Dulles said that attempts by the Vatican to improve
relations with Judaism is part of a larger effort to improve relationships
with many groups. Recognizing that the "polemics of the past have
been harmful," Vatican II sought a more positive relationship despite
the differences. "We must realize more fully that diversity is not
a bad thing," he said.
Griswold quoted the Jewish scholar Abraham Heschel
who said that "pluralism is the will of God," adding that he "sometimes
wonders about God's imagination creating three siblings - Jews,
Christians and Muslims. Do we in some way exist to remind one another
that none of us has the absolute corner on God's self-disclosure?
God's own desire is that we be not just tolerant, but recognize
each other as offspring of Abraham."
Lamm said that he hesitates to use the term pluralism.
"If pluralism means that everyone is right and no one is wrong it
reduces itself to a kind of relativism that misses the grandeur
of each religion and its own tradition. Pluralism means being human,
civilized, loving," he said.
Korn warned that "notions of pluralism and tolerance
are sometimes masks for apathy and indifference. The great challenge
is to have absolute conviction and fidelity to our traditions and
yet still find space for the other, with respect and dignity - seeing
each other as human beings created in the image of God."
Korn said that religious appreciation of pluralism
is a radical and rather new concept. "How do we see the other as
somehow a catalyst or agent for affirming our own faith? How do
we see the other as a representative of God's world that deepens
our own faith tradition?" he asked.
Challenge of secularism
"Exposure to the authenticity and integrity of
one another's worship traditions can do a tremendous amount," said
Griswold. During a Jewish service in Jerusalem he realized that
Torah represents God's loving disclosure. "I could see a passion
and love that transformed it from words into relationship," he said.
"That's who Christ is for me. By experiencing this Jewish reality
my own reality is expanded."
"Hostility among religions is the principal cause
of secularism," said Dulles. "People think of religion as divisive.
It doesn't have to be, it can be unitive." Griswold added that "one
of the sadnesses in our own day is how religion is used to reinforce
division and hatreds, perpetuating cycles of mistrust and violence."
"Because religion is so very important, touching
the destiny of man, therefore it can be corrupted and hostilities
can result that are not necessary," said Lamm. "The patterns that
shape us can also become idols that we worship, quite apart from
where they are meant to lead us," said Griswold.
The issue of conversion
Announcing that he was ready to "throw a monkey
wrench into the happy conversation," Korn said, "One of the most
difficult issues between Jews and Christians over the ages has been
the issue of conversion. The traditional doctrine in Christianity
says that prior to the birth of Jesus the Jewish people had a living
covenant with God and Christianity came to replace Judaism and render
it obsolete."
Dulles agreed that it was "a sensitive question.
We have a desire that people more and more come to recognize Jesus
as the son of God - but that does not mean an effort to force people
into belief through moral or physical coercion. That doesn't work.
That's why Vatican II's Decree on Religious Freedom said that faith
had to be something voluntary and free."
"When Paul says that the call of Israel is irrevocable,
I take that very seriously," said Griswold. "He says clearly that
the promises of God are irrevocable. That says to me that Judaism
is a living faith and Christians make a mistake in seeing Israel
solely in a New Testament context and ignoring the rabbinic tradition
which is so rich and full."
Living covenant
"Everyone agrees that Judaism is not superceded
because that would mean there is no Judaism," said Lamm. "That would
be committing spiritual suicide." The issue of conversion becomes
important when "the consequences of those beliefs affect our lives."
He noted that history shows that " most conversions have been fraught
with violence and deception. That goes beyond dialogue. We believe
we have a covenant with God."
Dulles agreed that "the covenant with Judaism
is a living thing and God's love for Israel is a very special one.
He has not retracted it. Yet Christ meant to say that everything
in Judaism points to him and he is the fulfillment of the law, not
the abolition."
Griswold said that "through the person of Jesus
I can call the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob my God, instead of
seeing it as a movement from Judaism toward Christianity, a door
has been opened to a whole tradition, a whole experience of God
that would otherwise be inaccessible to me through the person of
Jesus who was a Jew. I can read the story of Exodus as somehow my
story too. "
Poison memories
Korn said that there is a paradox at work in
the relation between Jews and Christians. Roman Catholics have no
mission to Jews "and that doesn't undermine the cardinal's conviction
about the universality of Jesus." The great 12th century rabbi,
Maimonides, was a harsh critic yet somehow regarded Christianity
as "a positive agent in history for the recognition of God. This
is a marvelous spiritual paradox we all must live with."
Korn read Micah's beautiful vision of the Messianic
era and asked, "What can we do as religious leaders to somehow bring
history closer to this vision? To what extent do we do it separately
and in cooperation?"
Griswold said that in all our traditions the
three siblings of Abraham speak of "the God of compassion and justice
- God's own view of how things ought to be. There is an incredible
opportunity to make common cause in repair of the worldsupporting
and strengthening one another out of the integrity of our traditions."
Dulles said that the pope talks about "the healing
of memories. The memories of the past poison our relationships with
one another. We must confront the past honestly and express repentance
and sorrow for what has gone wrong and confess that until we begin
to acquire a common history. We must go through that painful process."
Common threads
Looking for some specific and concrete ways to
move toward a vision of peace and tolerance, it helps to take a
look at what is happening on the local level, Griswold suggested.
In marriage between Christians and Jews, for example, "both become
clearer about their tradition but also common threads that could
be shared." Lamm said that his experience with intermarried couples
was that "rarely does it result in a deepening of religious experience
or observance. It tends toward syncretism, watering down differences"
and a loss of identity, damaging to both religions.
Does the Muslim call for jihad bring Jews and
Christians together in any way, came the question. "Yes, out of
shared anxiety and fear," said Griswold. "Our experience after 9-11
creates a climate of anxiety that draws us together - not out of
our best emotions. It's important to be careful not to blanket all
of Islam with an epithet like terrorist."
But we must avoid acting aggressive out of fear,
warned Dulles. "If we could get rid of our fears we could build
peace more successfully."
Lamm said that the situation opens the potential
for what he called "a shared victimhood" in facing the potential
violence. "It's terribly sad that whatever voices of moderation
in the Islamic world, very few are heard. Islam is a great religious
tradition but where do we hear a voice from an imam speaking to
his own people, saying this idea of violence and hatred of others
may be a strand in Islam but it's not an important one?"
"It's very easy for someone with few principles
to be tolerant of others who have no principles," said Lamm. "But
to have a vision of what you consider the truth and terribly important,
that is sacred and forms your life, your whole essence, and yet
not to be intolerant of those who have different points of view
- that's an achievement, a spiritual achievement."
Episcopal News Service
James Solheim is director of the Episcopal News Service.
|