March 31, 2003
The Society of St. Andrew hunger relief organization
looks back on 2002 as a qualified success.
Like most charities, the Society of St. Andrew
experienced a decline in revenue, but the ministry had its third-best
year in two decades of getting food into the hands of hungry people.
Cash donations dropped in 2002 from almost $2
million in 2001 to a little more than $1.8 million. This reduced
the amount of produce the society could ship from the fields to
where the food was needed. In addition, drought in some areas of
the United States meant smaller or no yields from some of the regular
producer-donors.
However, the society found more farmer-food providers,
so the highest number of this type of contributor - 567 - was reached
in 2002. More volunteers - 43,292 - also participated in the food
reclamation projects than ever before. That number is 7,789, or
22 percent, greater than in 2001, the previous record year.
During 2002, food was also distributed to 4,084
receiving agencies, such as food banks and soup kitchens - more
than ever before.
In the first two months of 2003, the society
saved about 3.1 million pounds of fresh produce, but this was down
44 percent from the same period last year.
Headquartered in Big Island, Va., the Society
of St. Andrew uses the biblical practice of gleaning as a means
of feeding hungry people. Thousands of volunteers do the work, gathering
food that otherwise would be discarded.
Founded in 1979 by two United Methodist ministers
and their families, the society began gleaning in 1983. Its well-known
Potato Project has been widely supported by United Methodist Men.
During 2002, the project salvaged about 14.5
million pounds of potatoes for America's hungry. This was about
11.9 million pounds less than the previous year, a decrease largely
due to shipping limits imposed by the financial shortfall.
Already in January and February this year, the
society has processed 1.85 million pounds of potatoes, or more than
5.5 million servings, but that is a decline of 30 percent from the
same period last year.
During 2002, society volunteers helped save more
than 31.9 million pounds of food, providing 95.8 million servings
at a cost of about 1 cent per serving. Packaging and delivery account
for most of the expense. The charity's overhead, at about 4.4 percent,
is one of the lowest of any nonprofit.
Since the society began organizing gleaning events,
it has saved and delivered 412.2 million pounds of food throughout
the 48 contiguous states. It now has 34 satellite gleaning networks
in New England and 16 states: Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, New
York, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia.
"During 2002, food was scarce because of ongoing
drought in many areas where Society of St. Andrew gleans," observed
the Rev. Ken Horne, executive director of the society. "And like
most nonprofits nationwide, we ended the year with a funding shortfall
due to the sluggish economy. But we continued to provide food for
'the least of these' through the worst months of the long winter
just passed."
He noted that 2003 holds many challenges. "But
no matter how difficult things get for us, they will be infinitely
worse for the poor," he said. "For this reason, we must persevere
in the face of our adversities and never give up the vision of a
world without hunger."
United Methodist News Service
|
|
Steve Compton, a student at
Emory Universitys Candler School of Theology in Atlanta,
loads potatoes into trucks for distribution to area food banks
during a student-organized "Potato Drop" on campus
in this 2002 file photo. The Society of St. Andrew hunger relief
organization looks back on 2002 as a qualified success. Like
most charities, the Society of St. Andrew experienced a decline
in revenue, but the ministry had its third-best year in two
decades of getting food into the hands of hungry people. Cash
donations dropped in 2002 from almost $2 million in 2001 to
a little more than $1.8 million. This reduced the amount of
produce the society could ship from the fields to where the
food was needed. In addition, drought in some areas of the United
States meant smaller or no yields from some of the regular producer-donors. |
|